Visualizing the Internet

2008 February 17

How could we even begin to wrap our heads around giv­ing visual form to zil­lions of imper­cep­ti­ble ones and zeros that fly around the world every second?

Akamai Technologies claims that they han­dle 10 to 20% of the world’s Internet traf­fic. (Akamai is hired by other com­pa­nies like Adobe, Apple and MySpace to host web graph­ics and stream­ing audio and video.) With access to data on about one-fifth of global net­work traf­fic, they’ve put together some inter­est­ing visu­al­iza­tions. These don’t pre­tend to be maps of the Internet, as oth­ers have done, but are still inter­est­ing ways to rep­re­sent over­all through­put, latency, and con­nec­tion paths.

5 comments. »

  1. Take a look at Akamai’s “Network Performance Comparison” on trans­mis­sions from Los Angeles to Tokyo. There is def­i­nitely some­thing wrong here - it shows “typ­i­cal” inter­net traf­fic between the two cities trav­el­ing through the Caribbean, sub-Saharan Africa, India, and south­ern China. This is obvi­ously not a plau­si­ble traf­fic route given the exten­sive cabling across the Pacific Ocean (see http://www.news.com/2300-1033_3-6035611-1.html for exam­ple). If I wanted East Asia and North America to share inter­net traf­fic, the last thing I would do is route pack­ets through Zimbabwe and the hurricane-prone island nations of the Caribbean! This makes no sense at all. Perhaps they didn’t want to incon­ve­nience their nice visu­als by rout­ing traf­fic west­ward from LA, dis­ap­pear­ing on the map’s left side and reap­pear­ing on the right in East Asia. Their ele­gant map­ping sys­tem seems to have for­got­ten that the globe is actu­ally round.

    Comment by michael — 2008 February 18 @ 2:23 pm

  2. Huh, this is inter­est­ing stuff, Scott. Too bad they only carry 10-20% of traf­fic. I won­der if the data would be the same at 80-90%?

    Have you seen these xkcd maps? One looks real, and the other is funny, but looks sur­pris­ing accurate.

    Comment by dan — 2008 February 19 @ 3:06 pm

  3. Those XKCD maps are great. Thanks for sharing.

    Comment by Scott — 2008 February 19 @ 4:59 pm

  4. The maps are inter­est­ing but the results could be pre­dicted with very lit­tle insider infor­ma­tion. I’m fairly tech­no­log­i­cally naive and they make sense to me. Maybe my naivete is the rea­son the maps seem log­i­cal? I won­der if this is a truly rep­re­sen­ta­tional sample.

    Comment by Pat — 2008 February 20 @ 3:47 pm

  5. Akamai may carry 10-20% of all inter­net traf­fic, but they appear to have about 70% mar­ket­share, and they recently won a patent case against the #2 com­pany, Limelight Networks:

    http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/08/03/02/1831240.shtml

    Comment by michael — 2008 March 02 @ 8:29 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Site content and design © copyright 2006–2008 Scott Murray.