Thesis Response No. 1

2008 February 19

callowness.png

Project: Pick a poten­tial the­sis issue you want to explore and respond to it.

Theory: I’m very inter­ested in how the vir­tual and the phys­i­cal realms trig­ger affect each other and effect changes or events in each other via ongo­ing feed­back mech­a­nisms. It bog­gles my mind to think about how many (phys­i­cal) actions we take in the real world as a result of (vir­tual) infor­ma­tion fed to us through net­works, where data exist as light and are lit­er­ally weight­less. How do flashes of light become man­i­fested in the phys­i­cal, expe­ri­en­tial world?

My the­ory is that the user is the point of inter­sec­tion (and inter­ac­tion) between the phys­i­cal and vir­tual realms, between objects and infor­ma­tion. The Earth enacts grav­ity and other phys­i­cal effects. Computing sys­tems enact data trans­fer and pro­cess­ing. But only sen­tient beings can find mean­ing in both, because they can under­stand what grav­ity means and under­stand what data trans­fer is by extrap­o­lat­ing out­wards, tak­ing what they grasp about these physical/virtual sys­tems and apply­ing them to hypo­thet­i­cal sce­nar­ios. I can imag­ine what would hap­pen if I threw a glass vase up in the air: It would fall back down, hit the ground, and prob­a­bly break into pieces. I’ve never thrown a vase before, but I can model and pre­dict that out­come with near-certainty because I have inferred the rules that gov­ern the system.

So, as a user/sentient being, my job is to intepret inputs, deduce the rules of the sys­tem (that would pro­duce those inputs), decide on a course of action, and then phys­i­cally man­i­fest that action. In the case of a dig­i­tal sys­tem, my phys­i­cal out­put (throw­ing a vase, press­ing a key, click­ing the mouse) is input for the vir­tual sys­tem, which responds accord­ing to its own rules, and on and on the feed­back loop goes.

I don’t think this project was extremely suc­cess­ful at address­ing those ideas, but it’s inter­est­ing nonethe­less. Try it out, and see if you can (1) deduce its rules and then (2) use them toward your own ends. Post a com­ment below with your findings.

Credits: Word list cour­tesy of mieliestronk.com.

Launch project >

4 comments. »

  1. Hmmm, I see how typ­ing a let­ter that exists in the word gives you another word, but the next word that appears seems to be ran­dom. Is that right?

    Comment by michael — 2008 February 20 @ 10:38 pm

  2. Yes, as long as you’re hold­ing down the key, it will cycle through a dic­tio­nary of ran­dom words start­ing with that letter.

    My next step on this one is to mod­ify it to be a puz­zle, so that you try and work your way through the entire alpha­bet (which can be tricky, since you can only use let­ters in the cur­rently active word).

    Comment by Scott — 2008 February 21 @ 9:54 am

  3. This was fun. It took awhile for me to get that the let­ter had to be in the word before it was “right.” For awhile I thought there were a cer­tain num­ber of words in the rota­tion. Then I fig­ured out that it must be some ran­dom offer­ing from a sig­nif­i­cantly long list.

    Comment by Pat — 2008 February 21 @ 11:38 pm

  4. Delighted to see “defen­es­tra­tion” in the list.

    Comment by Karen — 2008 February 22 @ 1:52 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Site content and design © copyright 2006–2008 Scott Murray.